Convergence frontier analysis of sparse-matrix quasi-Newton methods: applications to rock blasting geomechanics

Authors

  • Fabian León Doctorado en Industria Inteligente, Facultad de Ingeniería, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Valparaíso 2362804, Chile
  • Luis Rojas Doctorado en Industria Inteligente, Facultad de Ingeniería, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Valparaíso 2362804, Chile
  • Cristian Gonzalez Doctorado en Ciencias, Facultad de Ingeniería, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
  • Beatriz Hernández Centro de Observación de la Tierra, Facultad de Ciencias, Ingeniería y Tecnología, Universidad Mayor, Santiago 8580745, Chile
  • José García Doctorado en Industria Inteligente, Facultad de Ingeniería, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Valparaíso 2362804, Chile

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65093/aci.v15.n2.2024.13

Keywords:

quasi-Newton methods, sparse matrices, convergence frontier, rock blasting

Abstract

We delimit the convergence frontier of sparse–matrix quasi-Newton algorithms for rock-blasting simulations. Lip- schitz/Hölder bounds yield Kantorovich radii that mark when the secant matrix preserves contraction. A limited- memory BFGS with adaptive switching to full Newton is introduced as the frontier is approached. A synthetic dataset of 25 000 cases, calibrated with limestone, copper and iron mines, reveals a 35 % larger convergence radius and a three-order reduction in runtime versus dense Newton. The iterative map exposes fragile-fracture regions, providing a preventive rule for drill-pattern and charge design. The results bridge nonlinear analysis with field practice, enabling stable, scalable HPC simulations for modern blast-engineering workflows.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2024-06-28

How to Cite

León, F., Rojas, L., Gonzalez, C., Hernández, B., & García, J. (2024). Convergence frontier analysis of sparse-matrix quasi-Newton methods: applications to rock blasting geomechanics. Avances En Ciencia E Ingeniería, 15(2), 51–63. https://doi.org/10.65093/aci.v15.n2.2024.13